Defense of alleged violations and motions to revoke community supervision.
A probation violation allegation puts the defendant in a difficult position. The state's burden is only preponderance of the evidence rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. The original punishment range becomes available again. And the judge who placed the defendant on probation now sees them again under unfavorable circumstances. Defense work requires both legal preparation and credible mitigation.
Texas community supervision comes in two main forms. Regular probation, also called straight probation, follows a finding of guilt and includes a suspended sentence that can be imposed if the defendant violates. Deferred adjudication probation involves a plea but no finding of guilt, with the case dismissed on successful completion and the full original punishment range available on revocation.
Both forms include conditions: reporting to a probation officer, paying fees and restitution, drug testing, community service, treatment, employment requirements, and avoiding further criminal conduct. Violation of any condition can trigger a motion from the state.
When the state alleges a probation violation, it files either a motion to revoke (for straight probation) or a motion to adjudicate (for deferred adjudication). The court issues a capias, which is an arrest warrant. The defendant is brought before the court for a revocation hearing.
At the hearing, the state must prove at least one alleged violation by a preponderance of the evidence. Defense counsel has the opportunity to contest the violations, present mitigating evidence, and propose alternatives to revocation.
Probation violations fall broadly into two categories. Technical violations involve failure to comply with conditions: missed reports, failed drug tests, unpaid fees, failure to complete required programming. New offense violations involve commission of a new criminal offense while on supervision.
New offense violations are more serious because they bring the underlying conduct into play. Technical violations often can be resolved through modification of probation conditions rather than revocation. Each requires its own defense approach.
Defending a probation violation case starts with examining whether the alleged violation actually occurred. Drug tests can produce false positives. Missed reports can have explanations. Failure to pay can reflect inability rather than willfulness. The state's evidence often relies on probation officer testimony that has its own gaps.
When the violation did occur, the work shifts to mitigation. Treatment enrollment, employment evidence, family support, and demonstrated change of circumstances all give the court reasons to continue supervision rather than impose the underlying sentence. The strongest mitigation packages are built by counsel who started working on them as soon as the motion was filed.
On revocation of straight probation, the court imposes the original suspended sentence, sometimes reduced. On adjudication of deferred adjudication, the court enters a judgment of conviction and assesses punishment within the full range for the original offense. That range can be substantially higher than what was originally available because deferred adjudication carries no upper limit beyond the offense range.
Avoiding revocation, when possible, is therefore often the single most important objective in these cases. Even reducing what otherwise would have been a prison sentence to a continuation of supervision under stricter conditions can be a significant outcome.
Talk to an attorney who handles these cases regularly. Consultation requests are reviewed personally and treated with full confidentiality.
Request a Consultation