1010 Heritage Center Circle, Round Rock, TX 78664 Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM CT

Civil Rights & Police Misconduct

Section 1983 civil rights claims and police misconduct litigation across Texas.

When law enforcement crosses the line from legitimate police work into constitutional violations, victims have legal recourse. The Brunner Law Firm represents individuals whose civil rights have been violated by government actors in Texas, including claims of excessive force, unlawful arrest, malicious prosecution, and Fourth Amendment search violations. These cases run parallel to and complement our criminal defense work.

What Is a Section 1983 Claim?

42 U.S.C. Section 1983 is the primary federal statute for suing government officials who violate constitutional rights under color of state law. A successful Section 1983 claim requires showing that a person acting in an official government capacity deprived you of a right secured by the Constitution or federal law.

Common bases for Section 1983 claims include excessive use of force under the Fourth Amendment, unlawful arrest without probable cause, unreasonable search and seizure, First Amendment retaliation, and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in custody. The standard is whether a reasonable officer would have known the conduct was unlawful, a doctrine developed through decades of Supreme Court precedent.

Excessive Force

Excessive force claims arise when officers use more force than the situation objectively requires. The Supreme Court in Graham v. Connor established a reasonableness standard that considers the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect posed an immediate threat, and whether the suspect was actively resisting or attempting to evade arrest.

Excessive force cases in Texas often involve deployment of tasers or pepper spray against non-resisting individuals, takedown maneuvers that cause serious injury, use of deadly force against unarmed persons, and force used after a threat has been neutralized. Video evidence from body cameras, dash cameras, and bystanders has made these cases both more visible and more litigable.

Unlawful Arrest and Malicious Prosecution

An arrest without probable cause violates the Fourth Amendment. When an officer fabricates evidence, ignores exculpatory information, or arrests a person without adequate legal basis, civil liability follows. Malicious prosecution claims extend the inquiry to cases where charges were filed and prosecuted without probable cause and were ultimately resolved in the plaintiff's favor.

In Texas, these claims often overlap with our criminal defense work. A client whose charges are dismissed or who is acquitted may have a viable civil rights claim arising from the same conduct. We evaluate both dimensions.

Municipal and Supervisory Liability

Individual officers are often protected by qualified immunity, which shields government officials from suit unless they violated clearly established law. This doctrine has narrowed the pool of recoverable cases considerably, which is why the policies and customs of the employing agency matter enormously.

Under Monell v. Department of Social Services, a municipality can be held liable when a constitutional violation results from an official policy, a widespread practice tantamount to policy, or a decision by a final policymaker. Training failures, inadequate supervision, and deliberate indifference to a pattern of violations can all support municipal liability. These claims require intensive investigation and expert analysis.

What to Expect in Civil Rights Litigation

Section 1983 litigation in federal court is intensive. Cases involve broad discovery, depositions of officers and supervisors, expert witnesses on use of force standards and police practices, and often years of litigation before resolution. The qualified immunity defense frequently triggers early dispositive motions that must be defeated before the case can reach a jury.

Damages in successful cases can include compensatory damages for physical and emotional injuries, lost wages, and medical expenses, as well as attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. Section 1988. Punitive damages are available against individual officers who acted with malicious intent or reckless disregard for rights.

Civil Rights Cases We Handle

  • Excessive force and police brutality
  • Unlawful arrest without probable cause
  • Unreasonable search and seizure
  • Malicious prosecution
  • First Amendment retaliation
  • Deliberate indifference to medical needs in custody
  • Municipal and supervisory liability claims
  • Wrongful death arising from police conduct
  • Strip search and body cavity search violations
  • Jail and prison conditions claims
  • False imprisonment
  • Retaliatory prosecution

Charged With a Civil Rights & Police Misconduct Offense?

Talk to an attorney who handles these cases regularly. Consultation requests are reviewed personally and treated with full confidentiality.

Request a Consultation